Court dismissed five writ petitions under Art. 226 seeking quashing of an impugned municipal receipt order as infructuous, noting petitioner counsel had withdrawn by email.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)Nos.14038 to 14042 of 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.11.2020 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.(MD)Nos.14038 to 14042 of 2010 and M.P.(MD)Nos.2, 2, 2, 2 & 2 of 2010
1.S.P.Rajamani ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.14038 of 2010 2.P.Mayan ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.14039 of 2010 3.K.Mahendar ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.14040 of 2010 4.K.N.P.Krishnan ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.14041 of 2010 5.V.Raman ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.14042 of 2010
Vs.
2.The Commissioner, Usilampatti Municipality, Usilampatti, Madurai District. ... Respondents in all W.Ps.
Common Prayer : Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.40446/2002/R2, dated 23.06.2005 on the file of the respondent No.1 and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioners : Mr.T.Lajapathy Roy (in all W.Ps.) For R1 : Mr.C.Ramesh, (in all W.Ps.) Special Government Pleader. For R2 : Mr.K.Mahendran (in all W.Ps.)
COMMON ORDER
(This Petitions were heard through Video Conferencing)
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the writ petitions now become infructuous. He has also sent an e.mail to that effect to the e.mail id mentioned in the causelist today.
1/2
W.P.(MD)Nos.14038 to 14042 of 2010
2.Recording the same, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Assistant Registrar (CS-II)
// True Copy //
/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
gns
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
W.P.(MD)Nos.14038 to
14042 of 2010 03.11.2020
NS(CO)
KM (23.11.2020) 2P 8C
2/2
1.S.P.Rajamani, 2.P.Mayan, 3.K.Mahendar, 4.K.N.P.Krishnan, 5.V.Raman
1.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, 2.The Commissioner, Usilampatti Municipality
Abdul Qudhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
