6.What requires to be noted here is the object of the State to promote the welfare and well being of the school children and when the post itself is a single sanctioned post and it has been held that such surplus post would arise in the school where there is a single sanctioned post, relying upon the minimum prescribed strength of 250 students, as a reason for denying the approval sought for, cannot be appreciated. Effectively what the Department would venture is, to deny the right of education to such girl students, particularly, in a specialized academic field of tailoring, which may be pertinent and essential requirement for a girl student. The Division Bench of this Court in the case of The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9 vs. S.Renganayagi in Writ Appeal No.1207 of 2016 dated 28.08.2010 had also held that when there are large number of girl students and the strength has also fallen short of a number of 250 prescribed students, which is the required minimum strength of sanctioned post and the State, on a wise policy has chosen to sanction the post, of a vocational skill, which can be important to girl students, the object of the State would be rendered futile on a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ mere reference to the principles, for the sake of denying the approval, particularly, in a single sanctioned post, can be termed
