In a writ petition, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court directed the District Collector to consider pending representations by the petitioner regarding her daughter's employment claim within 12 weeks. The court refrained from adjudicating the merits of the claim.
Direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representations within 12 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD) No.3180 of 2020
Mallika
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.02.2020 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.(MD) No.3180 of 2020
... Petitioner
/Vs./
1.The Director,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department,
Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
District Collector Office,
Tirunelveli District,
Tirunelveli 627 009.
3.The District Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Officer, District Collector Office, Tirunelveli District,
Tirunelveli 627 009.
4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Tirunelveli Rural Sub Division,
Thalaiyuthu, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to provide employment to the petitioner's daughter namely Pushparani daughter of late Govdindhan by considering her educational qualification as per Serial No.46 of Annexure-I read with Rule 12(4) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Rules, 2016 within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karunanidhi For Respondents : Mr.R.Sethuraman Special Government Pleader
ORDER
By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.
1/3
W.P.(MD) No.3180 of 2020
Annexure-I read with Rule 12(4) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Rules, 2016, in my view, such a decision is to be taken by the second respondent and in case, the petitioner is aggrieved against such any decision, it would be appropriate to approach this Court.
Assistant Registrar
// True Copy //
/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
rmk
To:
1.The Director,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
2/3
W.P.(MD) No.3180 of 2020
2.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli 627 009.
Order made in W.P.(MD)No.3180 of 2020
KK/02.03.2020/3P-7C
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court can direct the second respondent to consider pending representations regarding employment deputation within a stipulated time.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mallika
The Director, Government of Tamil Nadu, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department
The District Collector, Tirunelveli District
The District Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Officer, Tirunelveli District
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli Rural Sub Division
M.S.Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
