3.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the petitioner had given a complaint on 12.11.2019 against the employees of TVS Private Services Limited stating that the vehicle was illegally taken by them. Based on the complaint given by the petitioner, enquiry was conducted on 19.02.2019 by summoning the employees of the third respondent, during the enquiry, it has been transpired that the petitioner, who had received financial facility from the third respondent for purchase of the Two Wheeler, had paid only two installments and thereafter, the petitioner has not paid the balance amount. She would further submit that the employees of the third respondent after giving due notice to the petitioner, had repossessed the vehicle and that the proceedings at the time of repossess had been videographed by the employees of the third respondent and it was shown. During the enquiry, finding that no offence had been committed, the enquiry has been closed.
