Disposed

S.Mohideen Abdul Kadar, v. the Chairman/ Principal

Madras HC13 Oct 2020WP(MD)/10857/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the Madurai Bench directed two respondents to process the petitioner unapproved layout regularisation application according to law within eight weeks, allowing them to avoid forwarding it to the first respondent under the 2020 Rules.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondents 2 and 3 to process the regularisation application within eight weeks.

S.Mohideen Abdul Kadar, Vs the Chairman/ Principal — Property and Title | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

W.P(MD).No.10857 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 13.10.2020

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P(MD).No.10857 of 2019

¶7

S.Mohideen Abdul Kadar

¶8

.. Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1. The Chairman/ Principal Secretary to Government, Hill Area Conservation Authority,

¶11

Housing and Urban Development Department,

¶12

Secretariat, Chennai 600 009

¶13

1. The Director of Town & Country Planning, Anna Salai,

¶14

Chennai 600 002

¶15

The Deputy Director of Town & Country Planning, Regional Office, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli- 5. .. Respondents

¶16

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 & 3 herein to forward the application of the petitioner for regularisation of unapproved lay out under reference No.DTCP/L/0036797/2017 to the Hill Area Conservation Authority (HACA) the respondent No.1 herein and to grant principle approval of lay out frame work within the period that may be fixed by this Court.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.K.Mu.Muthu, Additional Government Pleader

¶18

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to forward the application of the petitioner for regularisation of his unapproved layout under reference No.DTCP/L/ 0036797/2017 to the Hill Area Conservation Authority (HACA).

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

1/3

¶23

W.P(MD).No.10857 of 2019

¶24

Mr.K.Mu.Muthu, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondents. By consent of both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶25

A counter affidavit has also been filed by the third respondent, wherein, they have stated in paragraph no.8 that, it is possible to regularise the petitioner's layout vide G.O.Ms.No.66, H & UD, dated 30.03.2020, under “the Tamil Nadu Regularization of Unapproved layouts and Plots in hill Area Rules 2020”. The learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents would further submit that the third respondent under the Tamil Nadu Regularisation of Unapproved Layouts and Plots in Hill Areas Rules 2020, is empowered to regularise the layouts. Hence, it is not necessary to forward the same to the first respondent as requested by the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioner's application, dated 29.11.2018 would be processed within the time period to be fixed by this Court.

¶26

Recording the submissions made by the learned Special Government Pleader as well as after recording the averments contained in the counter affidavit filed by the third respondent, this Court directs the respondents 2 & 3 to process the application of the petitioner seeking for regularisation of his unapproved layout measuring 4 acres 98 cents in S.Nos.576/1, 576/2, 560, 568/1, 559/1A, 559/2A at Nambithalaivanpattayam village, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶27

With these directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as costs.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶30

sts

¶31

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/3

¶34

W.P(MD).No.10857 of 2019

¶35

To 1) The Chairman/ Principal Secretary to Government, Hill Area Conservation Authority, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009 2) The Director of Town & Country Planning, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002 3) The Deputy Director of Town & Country Planning, Regional Office, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli- 5. +1 CC to the SPL GP ( SR-20158[F] dated 15/10/2020 ) Order made in

¶36

W.P(MD).No.10857 of 2019 Dated:

¶37

13.10.2020

¶38

PU(CO) CS(03.11.2020) 3P 5C

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶40

3/3

S.Mohideen Abdul Kadar, v. the Chairman/ Principal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Mohideen Abdul Kadar, v. the Chairman/ Principal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Ramamoorthy Vs the Director

P.Sumathi Vs the Vice President (Group Operation Dept)

R.Indira Vs the Chairman

Dr. Selvin Innocent Vs the Central Registrar of

P.Perumal Vs The District Collector

S.Ramesh Vs M/s.Uniter INdia Insurance Company Ltd.