The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing railway authorities to dispose of a representation regarding a tender. The Court dismissed the petition as the tender notification was already discharged prior to the representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 28.01.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
W.P.No.812 of 2020
M/s.Unique Builders Rep. By its Partner Mr.N.Sreenivasan
.. Petitioner
..Vs..
Park Town, Chennai -3.
Head Quarters' Office,
Park Town, Chennai -3. ..Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose off the petitioner's representation dated 04.01.2020 pertaining to the respondents' Tender No.MAS19OF19269 BRI.
For Petitioner : MR.Amalaraj.S.Penikilapatti
For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Ramkumar
O R D E R
This writ petition had been filed in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 04.01.2020 in relation with the Tender No.MAS19OF19269 BRI of the respondents.
1/3
“4. I submit that, tender accepting authority recommended to discharge the tender on 27.12.2019 and advised to call for fresh tender citing certain technical reasons. In view of the recommendation made by tender accepting authority, the tender notification No.MAS19OF19269 BRI has already been discharged on 27.12.2019. Hence, the relief sought by the petitioner in his representation dated 04.01.2020 cannot be considered in this writ petition.”
2/3
W.P.No.812 of 2020
pp(co)
nr 25/02/2020
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can dismiss a writ petition seeking disposal of a representation regarding a discharged tender.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Unique Builders
The General Manager, Southern Railway
The Principal Chief Engineer, Southern Railway
The Additional Divisional Railway Manager-II, Chennai Division
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
