This Bench dismissed a review application challenging an order directing the appointment of a respondent as a Forest Guard. The Court held the application lacked merits as it attempted to re-adjudicate settled issues and raising grounds for appeal in a review.
Review application No.44 of 2020 stands dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.02.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
REVIEW APPLICATION NO.44 OF 2020
The Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu Forest Uniformed Services, Recruitment Committee, 8th Down Floor, Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015.
...Applicant/Respondent Vs.
Thiru.M.Susil kumar ...Respondent/Petitioner
Prayer : Review Application filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 r/w Sec.114 of C.P.C, to review the order dated 12.04.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.M.Subramaniam, made in W.P.No.9341 of 2019 on the file of this Court.
W.P.No.9341 of 2019
Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to consider the application of the Petitioner bearing Registration number 1800039898 and provisionally select and appoint the Petitioner to the post of Forest Guard eith Driving License
For Applicant : Mr.M.Elumalai, AGP For Respondent : Mr.T.Sellapandian
ORDER
This review application has been filed to review the order dated 12.04.2019 made in W.P.No.9341 of 2019 on the file of this Court.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
gsk
To
The Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu Forest Uniformed Services, Recruitment Committee, 8th Down Floor, Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015.
+1cc to the Special Government Pleader(Forest), SR.NO.6637
Review Application No.44 of 2020
CA(CO)
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ KKV/08/03/2021
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a review application is maintainable when it seeks to re-adjudicate merits already considered by the Court.
Whether a review application is maintainable when the grounds raised are grounds for appeal rather than error apparent on the face of record.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu Forest Uniformed Services, Recruitment Committee
M.Susilkumar
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
