The High Court of Madras, in a writ petition filed under Article 226 praying for a writ of Mandamus, dismissed the petition as infructuous upon submitting counsel's submission that the sought relief had become academic.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.11.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.7346 of 2017 and W.M.P. No. 8866 of 2017
R. Venkatesan ...Petitioner .vs.
For Petitioner : Mr. Siddiswaran For Respondents : Ms. A. Madhumathi, Special Government Pleader O R D E R
Mr.Siddiswaran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous, hence, the Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(LA)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
W.P.No.7346 of 2017 and
W.M.P. No.8866 of 2017
ppa (co)
rr ii (11/12/2020)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Venkatesan
The Sub Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District
The Tahsildar, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
