Disposed

jeevanantham v. The Tahsildhar

Madras HC18 Nov 2020WP/6723/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Disposing a writ petition under Article 226, the Court directed the petitioner to pay necessary survey charges. Upon payment, the respondent Tahsildar is directed to survey the land in Survey No.319/41 and fix boundary stones after notifying interested parties within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to pay survey charges; respondent directed to survey land and fix boundary stones after notice, within eight weeks of payment.

jeevanantham Vs The Tahsildhar — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRA

¶2

DATED: 18.11.2020

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.No.6723 of 2017

¶6

Jeevanantham ... Petitioner Vs. The Tahsildar, Gummudipoondi Taluk, Thiruvallur District. ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to measure the petitioner's property in S.No.319/41 and put boundary stones on the basis of petitioner's representation dated 30.12.2016.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Shanmugam For Respondent : Ms.A.Madhumathi, Special Government Pleader O R D E R

¶8

The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to measure the petitioner's property in S.No.319/41 and fix boundary stones on the basis of petitioner's representation dated 30.12.2016.

¶9

2.Mr.K.Shanmugam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that though the petitioner has given his representation to the respondent as early as on 30.12.2016 for surveying and fixing the boundary stones in his lands, the said exercise has not yet been done by the respondent.

¶10

3.Ms.A.Madhumathi, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that in the event of the petitioner paying the necessary charges, the respondent would consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.12.2016 and complete the exercise within a period of eight weeks time.

¶11

4.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

prayer sought for in the Writ Petition, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to pay the necessary charges for surveying the land and fixing the boundary stones in his land in Survey No.319/41 and on payment of the said amount, the respondent is directed to conduct the survey and fix the boundary stones in Survey No.319/41, after giving notice to all the interested parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶14

5.With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶15

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
va
To
The Tahsildar,
Gummudipoondi Taluk,
Thiruvallur District.
+1 cc to The Government Pleader, Sr.No. 37153
W.P.No.6723 of 2017
GP(CO)
RMP(10/12/2020)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

jeevanantham v. The Tahsildhar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

jeevanantham v. The Tahsildhar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Palanisamy Vs The District Collector

A.C.Sivakumar, Vs The Chairman, (Superintending

T. Thangapushpam Vs The Tahsildar

P.Nandakumar Vs The District Collector

B.Dhakshinamoorthy, Vs The District Collector

C.Ramakrishnan Vs The President