The Court ordered that the petitioner be permitted to appear in the written examination and have results published alongside other candidates pursuant to an interim order, resulting in the closure of the writ petition.
The writ petition was closed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.02.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
WP.No.450 of 2020
J.Vivekananthan
.. Petitioner
- Vs -
.. Respondent
The Tamil Nadu Uniformed Service, Recruitment Board, Rep. by its Chairman, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to permit the petitioner to attend the written examination for the post of Sub Inspector of Police conducted on 12.01.2020.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Madhu Prakash For Respondent : Mr.V.Kadhirvel, Special Government Pleader O R D E R
Pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court on 09.01.2020, the petitioner has been permitted to appear in the examination and the results of the petitioner can be published along with all the other candidates.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-IV) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
KMI
To
The Tamil Nadu Uniformed Service, Recruitment Board, Rep. by its Chairman, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 3162
WP.No.450 of 2020
RR(CO)
GN(11/03/2020)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to appear in the written examination and have results published alongside other candidates despite procedural irregularities.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
J. Vivekananthan
Tamil Nadu Uniformed Service, Recruitment Board
N. Anand Venkatesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
