The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 requesting subdivision of land and issuing a separate patta, due to the petitioner's non-prosecution across multiple listing dates.
The Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.12.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.3931 of 2017
K.Govindaraj ... Petitioner
15.Marimuthu
16.Thalaiyal Nayagi
... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to sub divide the lands in Survey No.278/1A and 104/3 and to issue separate patta in the name of the petitioner herein and take appropriate action on the authorities.
For Petitioner : Ms.M.N.Harini – no appearance For Respondents : Ms.A.Madhumathi,
Special Government Pleader (R1 to R5)
O R D E R
Consistently, there is no representation for the petitioner. When the matter was listed for hearing on 18.11.2020, there was no representation for the petitioner, hence, the matter was adjourned to 02.12.2020. On 02.12.2020 also, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “for dismissal” on 04.12.2020. Though the matter has been listed under the caption “for dismissal”, today also, none appeared for the petitioner. Hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss the Writ Petition for nonprosecution. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
-Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS ) // True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar
va
To
Office of the District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram.
Office of the Tahsildar, Ulundhurpet, Villupuram District.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Govindaraj
The District Revenue Officer
The Tahsildar
The Public Information Officer
The Revenue Divisional Officer
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
