3.Admittedly, the petitioner had slept over for more than 90 years in questioning the classification of the land as Government Poramboke. That apart, on a perusal of the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition, it could be seen that the petitioner is seeking for a direction to the authorities to execute the Sale Deed in his favour, which implies that the respondents are the owners of the land. When the petitioner himself admits that the respondents are the owners of the land and seeking for a direction to execute a Sale Deed in his favour, the same cannot be granted in a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. If at all, the petitioner can only file a Civil Suit seeking for such a direction by adducing oral and documentary evidences. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that there were Civil Suits filed in the year 1913, however, the said suit was filed only against private parties. Further, the petitioner cannot rely upon the decree dated 27.09.1916 passed in O.S.No.21 of 1913. When the Government is the owner of the land in question, the plaintiffs in the suit should have made Government as a party. When the issue has already been settled long back, classifying the land in question as Government Poramboke, the same cannot be un-settled after a period of 90 years. Further, in the prayer in the Writ Petition, the petitioner has stated that the Old Survey Numbers of the land in question are 49B and 51A and the New Survey Number is 162/4. However, on a perusal of the list of joint pattadars in the Village of Musiri Taluk, Trichirappalli District, it is clear that the New Survey
