Disposed

R.Anvardeen, v. The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board

Madras HC11 Feb 2020WP/3270/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging a suspension order by the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board was disposed of without deciding merits. The court directed the second respondent to examine the petitioner's representation dated 18.11.2019 and pass appropriate orders.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to examine the representation dated 18.11.2019 and pass appropriate orders on or before 31.03.2020.

R.Anvardeen, Vs The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 11.02.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶5

W.P.No.3270 of 2020

¶6

and

¶7

W.M.P.Nos.3779, 3781 and 3782 of 2020

¶8

R.Anvardeen .. Petitioner

¶9

..Vs.. 1.The Tamil Nadu Walf Board, Rep. by the Special Officer, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakadi Nagar, Chennai-600 001.

¶10

2.The Chief Executive officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1,Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakadi Nagar, Chennai-600 001. .. Respondents

¶11

PRAYER : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the order made in Vide Proc.No.850/E1/2019 dated 20.02.2019 issued by the second respondent and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all attendant benefits.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Nagarathinam For Respondents: Mr.Mohammed Fayaz Ali

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

Mr.Mohammed Fayaz Ali, learned counsel takes notice for the respondents. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶15

2.The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the order made in Proc.No.850/E1/2019

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

dated 20.02.2019 by the second respondent and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all attendant benefits.

¶18

On 20.02.2019, a resolution was passed by the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, to suspend the petitioner namely R.Anvardeen and thereafter the papers were forwarded to the Director of the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Department for enquiry. The petitioner was also placed on suspension by proceedings of the Chief Executive officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board in proceedings Proc.No.850/E1/2019 dated 22.02.2020. In this connection the petitioner gave a representation on 18.11.2019. It is his grievance that till date his representation has not been considered by the respondents. Hence, he filed the present writ petition.

¶19

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner gave a representation on 18.11.2019 to the respondent to revoke the suspension order. He stated that this Court may issue a direction to the respondent to dispose of the representation.

¶20

5.Heard, both sides.

¶21

6.Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is inclined to issue a direction to the respondents, particularly, the second respondent to examine the aspects raised in the representation dated 18.11.2019 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders on or before 31.03.2020. If necessary, the respondent shall issue notice to the petitioner and to any other connected individual.

¶22

7.With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶23

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶24

True Copy

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶26

¶27

1.The Special Officer,

¶28

The Tamil Nadu Walf Board, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakadi Nagar, Chennai-600 001.

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2.The Chief Executive officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1,Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakadi Nagar, Chennai-600 001.

¶31

+1 CC to Mr.A.Nagarathinam, Advocate sr 11098.

¶32

W.P.No.3270 of 2020

¶33

AD(CO)
SP(21/02/2020)

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Anvardeen, v. The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Anvardeen, v. The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.P.Deva Rajan Vs The District Collector

Vgn Garden Plot Owners Welfare Association Vs The District Collector

V.Bhanumathi Vs The Principal Secretary

Tamil Nadu Adhi Andhira Maha Sabha Vs The Chairman

M/s. Steel and Grip, Vs M/s. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

S.Vijayakumar Vs The Indian Bank