The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking protection for their business. Due to the petitioner's failure to appear at the hearing despite directions to post notice, the court inferred abandonment of the petition and dismissed it for non-prosecution, closing connected miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.02.2020 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P. No.29363 of 2012 and MP Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 & 1 of 2013
M/s.Karunya Enterprises
Rep. by its Managing Partner,
S.Azir. ... Petitioner
Vs
1. The District Collector,
Tiruvallur District,
Tiruvallur.
2. The Tahsildar,
Madhavaram Taluk,
Madhavaram,
Chennai - 600 060.
3. The Inspector of Police,
M-2, Madhavaram Milk
Colony,
Chennai - 600 060.
4. Kasinathan
5. Sekar ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from interferring with the peaceful running of the petitioner's business at No.4/20A, Ellaiamman Koil Street, Panchayat Road, Manjambakkam, Chennai - 600 060 and direct the 3rd respondent to give protection to the business of the petitioner company.
1/3
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondents
: Mr.G.K.Muthukumar Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.G.Prabhakaran for R4 & R5
ORDER
This Court by its earlier order dated 04.02.2020 recorded the submissions made by the learned counsel on record for the petitioner that he has given change of vakalth and this court directed the Registry to print the name of the petitioner on 11.02.2020. Accordingly, on 11.02.2020, the name of the petitioner was printed in the cause list and there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. This Court directed the Registry to post the matter on 14.02.2020 under the caption "for dismissal". Today also, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the Writ Petition.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/Asst.Registrar (CS VI ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar vsi2 To 1. The District Collector, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur. 2. The Tahsildar, Madhavaram Taluk, Madhavaram, Chennai - 600 060. 2/3
W.P. No.29363 of 2012
+1 cc to Government Pleader sr13079
ca(co) aa17/03/2020
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Karunya Enterprises
The District Collector, Tiruvallur District
The Tahsildar, Madhavaram Taluk
The Inspector of Police, M-2, Madhavaram Milk Colony
Kasinathan
Sekar
Abdul Qudduse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
