Writ petition filed under Article 226 for mandamus directed to the Director General of Police was dismissed by the Hon'ble Court as infructuous. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.02.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.15627 of 2013
and M.P.No.1 of 2013
T.S.Dhakshinamurthy ... Petitioner Vs.
The Director General of Police, O/o.the Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai,
Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004. ... Respondent
Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to take necessary action on the representation dated 14.05.2013 sent by the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Narendran For Respondent : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari Additional Government Pleader ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has now become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (CCC) //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sms
To
The Director General of Police, O/o.the Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.
W.P.No.15627 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
PA(CO)
GN(18/03/2020)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.S. Dhakshinamurthy
The Director General of Police
Abdul Qudhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
