The High Court disposed the writ petition as nothing remained for its consideration after the First Respondent disposed of the underlying appeal and a revision was filed against that disposal order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.01.2020 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU W.P. No. 28734 of 2019 and W.M.P. No. 28484 of 2019
S. Chellappan
... Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the First Respondent to forthwith consider and pass orders on the Appeal of the Petitioner dated 03.09.2019 within one week after affording a reasonable opportunity to the Petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr. K. Selvaraj
For Respondents: Mr. J. Purushothaman
The Writ Petition has been filed for a direction to the First Respondent to consider and pass orders on the appeal dated 03.09.2019 filed by the Petitioner.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ssi/vjt
To
+1cc to Mr.K.Selvaraj , Advocate SR.No. 716
+1cc to Mr.V.J.Suresh kumar , Advocate SR.No. 1043
+1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.No. 1332
W.P. No. 28734 of 2019
and W.M.P. No. 28484 of 2019
A.SK(23/01/2020)
S. Chellappan
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chennai South Division
The Tahsildar, Velachery
V.P.R. Varadharajan
V. Vikram
A.V. Krishnan
P.D. Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
