K.Sridharan v. the Junior Engineer
Case brief
What is this about?
, three writ petitions filed under Article 226 against the Chennai Corporation for the demarcation of private land were disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.08.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.27299, 27300 and 27308 of 2013 and M.P.Nos. 1, 1 and 1 of 2013
K.Sridharan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.27299/2013 K.Kumar ... Petitioner in W.P.No.27300/2013 K.Mohan ... Petitioner in W.P.No.27308/2013 Vs. 1.The Junior Engineer, Chennai Corporation, Ward No.145, Karmikar Street, Nerkundram, 107, Thiruvallur District. 2.The Zonal Officer, Chennai Corporation, Ward No.145, Arcot Street, Valasarawalkam, Chennai – 600 087. ... Respondents in all 3 W.Ps Common Prayer Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent forbearing from erecting any cable and by digging pit in the lands of petitioner bearing Door Nos.3, 1 and 2, Nerkundram Colony Main Road earlier called as Perumal Koil Street.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Hariharan (in all 3 W.Ps) For Respondents: Mr.M.Ganesan, (in all 3 W.Ps) Standing Counsel – Corporation
Mr.K.R.Hariharan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the relief sought for in the Writ Petitions have become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Sridharan
- petitioner
K. Kumar
- petitioner
K. Mohan
- respondent
The Junior Engineer, Chennai Corporation
- respondent
The Zonal Officer, Chennai Corporation
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court