Consistently, there was no representation for the petitioner. When the matter was listed on 17.07.2020, the learned counsel for the petitioner was not present to make his submission, hence, the matter was adjourned to 24.07.2020. On 24.07.2020 also, the learned counsel for the petitioner was not present and hence, the matter was adjourned to 30.07.2020. On 30.07.2020 also, the learned counsel for the petitioner was not present and hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “for dismissal” on 04.08.2020 (i.e.) today. Though the matter has been listed under the caption “for dismissal”, today also, the learned counsel for the petitioner is not present and hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss the Writ Petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.