The writ petition filed under Article 226 was dismissed for non-prosecution. The petitioners failed to appear before the court on two consecutive listing dates, leading to the dismissal of the petition on 06.10.2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.10.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.2156 of 2015
1.Dhamodharan
2.Rajeswari
3.Shanmugam
4.Kumarasamy
5.K.Saravanan
6.Sivaparavathy
7.Mahalakshmi
8.Kumaresan
9.Maragathavalli ...Petitioners
(Petitioners are represented by their
Power of Attorney Agent Vinod Kumar)
Vs.
1.The Commissioner,
Office of the Commissioner of Survey and
Settlement, Ezhilagam,
Chennai – 600 005.
2.The District Collector,
Chennai District,
Office of Chennai Collectorate,
Chennai – 600 001.
3.The Tahsildar,
Saidapet Taluk,
Saidapet Taluk Office,
Chennai – 600 015. ... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 08.01.2015 and dispose of the same in accordance with law.
For Petitioners : Mr.T.Arul – no appearance For Respondents : Ms.A.Madhumathi, Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
Consistently, there is no representation for the petitioners. When the matter was listed for hearing on 08.09.2020, the learned counsel for the petitioners was not present, hence, the matter was adjourned to 30.09.2020. On 30.09.2020 also, there was no representation for the petitioners, hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter “for dismissal” on 06.10.2020. Though the matter has been listed under the caption “for dismissal”, today also, the learned counsel for the petitioners is not present and hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss the Writ Petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Commissioner,
Office of the Commissioner of Survey and
Settlement, Ezhilagam,
Chennai – 600 005.
2. The District Collector,
Chennai District,
Office of Chennai Collectorate,
Chennai – 600 001.
3. The Tahsildar,
Saidapet Taluk,
Saidapet Taluk Office,
Chennai – 600 015.
+1cc to the Government Pleader in SR.NO..33080
W.P.No.2156 of 2015
LN(CO)
RV(16/10/2020)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dhamodharan
Rajeswari
Commissioner
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
