The Court dismissed a Writ Petition seeking cancellation of Sale Deeds for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the listed dates despiteRegistry direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.10.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.15785 of 2017 and WMP No.17079 of 2017
C.Ponnurangam ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai – 600 028.
2.The District Registrar, Vellore District, Vellore.
3.The Sub Registrar Office, Thirupathur, Vellore District.
4.M.S.Ganesh 5.M.Muthuraj 6.R.Subramanian 7.Karthika 8.S.M.Shanmugam 9.A.Arumugam ... Respondents
Prayer:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to cancel the Sale Deed dated 18.04.2017 vide Doc.No.3731 of 2016 and 3732 of 2016 executed by the 9th respondent herein in favour of the respondents 4 to 8 herein with the property situated at Survey No.59, Su Pallipatti Village, Thirupathur Taluk, Vellore District and another property comprised in Survey No.170, Thirupathur Village and Taluk, Vellore District.
Petitioner : Mr.C.Ponnurangam – no appearance For Respondents : Mr.B.Kannan, Government Advocate (R1 to R3) O R D E R
When the matter was listed for hearing on 28.09.2020, Mr.R.Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
reported “no instructions” and hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter on 30.09.2020 by printing the name of the petitioner. Though the name of the petitioner was printed in the cause list on 30.09.2020, none appeared for him, hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter “for dismissal” on 06.10.2020. Though the matter has been listed under the caption “for dismissal”, printing the name of the petitioner, today also none appeared for him. Hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss the Writ Petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
W.P.No.15785 of 2017 and M.P.No.1 of 2017
ssv[co] srg 21/10/2020
C. Ponnurangam
Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai
District Registrar, Vellore District, Vellore
Sub Registrar Office, Thirupathur, Vellore District
M.S. Ganesh
M. Muthuraj
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
