Maria Pushpam v. the Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition filed for mandamus directing issuance of a cheque for Rs. 1,00,000 was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear despite multiple listings.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.01.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P. No.20504 of 2012
Maria Pushpam ... Petitioner Vs The Collector, Nagapattinam District, Nagapattinam. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, direction in the nature of writ, to the respondent to disbursing the said Rs.1,00,000/- [Rupees One Lakh Only] to the petitioner. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari Additional Government Pleader ORDER The matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, today. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on the last occasion i.e. on 24.01.2020, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
vsi2/ah
1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Maria Pushpam
- respondent
The Collector, Nagapattinam District
Coram
Abdul Quddose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court