The court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear or present representation on the day of hearing or the previous occasion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.01.2020
C O R A M
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.19117 of 2013
M.Thiagarajan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner, The State Information Commission, Thiagarajar Salai, Thenampet, Chennai – 18.
2.The Appellate Authority, Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – 5.
3.The Public Information Officer, Tambaram Municipality, Tambaram. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to take appropriate action on the 3rd respondent as per the order of the 1st respondent in case No.38454/enquiry/D/2012 dated 01.03.2013 and provide all the required information as per the order of the 1st respondent in case no.38454/enquiry/D/2012 dated 19.11.2012 within a time frame.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondent 1 : Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan, for M/s.G.R.Associates
For Respondent 2 : Mr.R.S.Selvam, Government Advocate For Respondent 3 : Mr.P.Srinivas
ORDER
The matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal” today. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on the earlier occasion i.e., on 21.01.2020, there was no
representation on the side of the petitioner. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Appellate Authority,
Municipal Administration,
Chepauk, Chennai – 5.
+1cc to M/s.G.R.Associates Sr.6923
+1cc to Mr.P.Srinivas, Advocate Sr.6428
W.P.No.19117 of 2013
ssd[co]
srg 10/03/2020
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Thiagarajan
The Commissioner, The State Information Commission
The Appellate Authority, Municipal Administration
The Public Information Officer, Tambaram Municipality
Abdul Quddhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
