Mr.Anandan v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition regarding patta issuance; court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.02.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P. No.19184 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
Anandan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 34. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Vellore, Vellore District. 3.The Inspector, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment, Vaniyambadi Taluk, Vellore District. 4.The District Collector, Vellore, Vellore District. 5.The Superintendent of Police, Vellore, Vellore District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.106/2013 dated 08.07.2013 on the file of the third respondent, and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the fourth respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner to an extent of one acre in S.No.49, in Naickanur Village, Vaniyambadi Taluk, Vellore District. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arokia Maniraj For R1 to R3 : Mrs.Jayantheswari Government Advocate (HR&CE) For R4 & R5 : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anandan
- respondent
Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment
- respondent
Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment
- respondent
Inspector, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment
- respondent
District Collector, Vellore
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court