A writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of an order and issuance of housing construction orders under the Chief Minister's Green House Scheme. The matter was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear and showed lack of interest in continuing the legal action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.02.2020
C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.11511 of 2012 & MP.No.2 of 2012
1.U.Subramanian
2.N.Arumugam
3.E.Usha
4.M.Muthusamy
5.Kasiyammal ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.The District Collector,
Thiruvannamalai,
Thiruvannamalai District.
2.The Block Development Officer,
Panchayat Union Office,
Pudupalaiyam Panchayat Union,
Chengam Taluk,
Thiruvannamalai District.
3.The commissioner, Pudupalayam Panchayat Union,
(C.Gengampattu Village Panchayat)
Japti Kaariyandhal Post,
Chengam Taluk,
Thiruvannamalai District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the Na.Ka.C2/513/2012 dated 08.02.2012 issued by the third respondent herein with the knowledge of the first respondent herein to quash the same and to direct the 1st to 2nd respondents once again to issue the housing construction orders to the petitioners herein under the Chief Minister's Green House Scheme in C.Gengampattu Village, Chengam Taluk, Thiruvannamali District.
For Petitioners : No appearance
For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari, Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
The matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal” today. There is no representation on the side of the petitioners. In an earlier occasion i.e., on 28.01.2020, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to list under the caption “for dismissal” on 31.01.2020. When the matter was came up for hearing on 31.01.2020, the learned counsel for the petitioners entered appearance and sought for an adjournment and only at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is listed under the same caption “for dismissal” today. It can now be inferred that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nl
To
1.The District Collector,
Thiruvannamalai,
Thiruvannamalai District.
2.The Block Development Officer,
Panchayat Union Office,
Pudupalaiyam Panchayat Union,
Chengam Taluk,
Thiruvannamalai District.
3.The commissioner, Pudupalayam Panchayat Union,
(C.Gengampattu Village Panchayat)
Japti Kaariyandhal Post,
Chengam Taluk,
Thiruvannamalai District.
+1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.No. 10896
W.P.No.11511 of 2012
NMI
A.SK(11/03/2020)
U.Subramanian and others
District Collector, Thiruvannamalai
Block Development Officer, Pudupalaiyam Panchayat Union
Commissioner, Pudupalayam Panchayat Union
Abdul Quddus
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
