The petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing land officials to issue patta was dismissed as withdrawn voluntarily by the petitioner, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition based on the judgment in the related civil suit.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.11.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.17922 of 2011
and M.P.No.1 of 2011
S.Mitra Srikanth ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, ... Respondents
rep by the Secretary to Government,
Revenue Department,
Secretariat, Fort St.George,
Chennai – 600 009.
3.The Special Tahsildar,
Town Survey (South),
Egmore – Nungambakkam Taluk,
Spur Tank Road, Chennai – 600 031.
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 2 & 3 to forthwith issue necessary patta in favour of the petitioner for the lands in grama natham site, belonging to the petitioner and admeasuring 9,525 sq.ft. comprised in Old S.No.136, New S.No.9 (Part) in Koyambedu Village, Chennai after classifying the same as “private Manai” as per G.O.Ms.No.1971 Revenue dated 14.10.1988.
For Petitioner : Ms.S.Rekha for Mr.R.Parthasarathy For Respondents : Ms.A.Madhumathi, Special Government Pleader
ORDER
Ms.S.Rekha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a Writ Petition based on the judgment to be delivered in the Civil Suit in C.S.No.564 of 2010 pending on the file of this Court.
2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is open to the petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition based on the judgment to be delivered in the Civil Suit in C.S.No.564 of 2010. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
-Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS III)
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar
va
To
1.The Secretary to Government,
State of Tamil Nadu,
Revenue Department,
Secretariat, Fort St.George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Special Commissioner and
Commissioner of Land Administration,
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
3.The Special Tahsildar,
Town Survey (South),
Egmore – Nungambakkam Taluk,
Spur Tank Road, Chennai – 600 031
+1 C.C. to Government Pleader SR.NO.37955
W.P.No.17922 of 2011
and M.P.No.1 of 2011
SAI (CO)
UM (14.12.2020)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ based on the outcome of the pending civil suit.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Mitra Srikanth
The State of Tamil Nadu
The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Administration
The Special Tahsildar
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
