M.Thangavel, v. The Sub Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras, in a Writ Petition under Article 226, closed the petition because the 2nd respondent (Tahsildar) had already conducted the survey of the disputed land on 16.11.2016, leaving no legal question for adjudication. No costs were awarded.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Petition is closed as the matter had already been disposed of at ground level.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.11.2020
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.39506 of 2016
M. Thangavel ...Petitioner
.vs.
- The Sub Collector, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District.
- The Tahsildar, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District. ...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to survey the land in S.F.No.380/A as per Doc.No.1522 of 1971 registered at Sub Registrar Office, Dharapuram and make correction in revenue records by considering the petitioner representation dated 16.08.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar For Respondents : Ms.A.Madhumathi, Special Govt. Pleader
O R D E R
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition should be closed as the 2nd respondent had already conducted the survey of the land in question.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Thangavel
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District
- respondent
The Sub Collector, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court