Disposed

R.Krishnamoorthy v. The District Collector

Madras HC9 Dec 2020WP/17780/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court, via writ petition under Article 226, directed the respondents to conclude the enquiry into the petitioner's representation regarding a Community Certificate for his daughters and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks, without adjudicating merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 3rd respondent to consider the representation dated 21.10.2019 on merits and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

R.Krishnamoorthy Vs The District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 09.12.2020

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. SATHYANARAYANAN

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA

¶7

W.P.No.17780 of 2020

¶8

R.Krishnamurthy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Thiruvallur District. 2.Revenue Divisional Officer, District Revenue Office, Ponneri Taluk. 3.The Thasildar, Ponneri Taluk. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to conclude the enquiry regarding and issue the Community Certificate to the three daughters of the petitioner as per law within a stipulated time period.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Divakaran For R1 to R3 : Ms.R.J.Radhika Government Advocate

¶10

(Order of the Court was made by M. SATHYANARAYANAN, J.) (Through Video Conferencing)

¶11

The petitioner claims that he belongs to Hindu, Scheduled Tribe, 'Kurumans' Community, and he has been issued with permanent community certificate in Pa.Mu.3615/92-'C', dated 29.04.1992, bearing Certificate No.3778323, issued by the Sub-Collector, Saidapet.

¶12

2.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit, that apart, in the transfer certificate issued in

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Page numbers

¶14

favour of the wife of the petitioner, it has been stated that she belongs to 'Kurumans' community, and that apart, the brother of the petitioner, namely, Mr.R.Suresh, has also got favourable orders for issuance of the said certificate vide order dated 30.08.2010 bearing No.8300/CV-II/2009. It is the further submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner has also submitted a representation, dated 21.10.2019, enclosing all the documents for issuance of a similar community certificate in favour of his daughters, namely, K.Swetha, K.Divyashree and K.Shamiksha, which was also followed by a reminder representation, dated 08.06.2020, and despite receipt and acknowledgment of the same, no steps are being taken by the 2^nd respondent to issue the certificate and prays for appropriate orders.

¶15

3.This Court heard the submissions of Ms.R.J.Radhika, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3, who would submit that, based on scrutiny and authentication of the documents enclosed along with the representation dated 21.10.2019, the request made by the petitioner would be considered in accordance with law.

¶16

4.This Court, taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances, without going into the merits of the claim projected by the petitioner either in the representation or in this writ petition, directs the 3^rd respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation, dated 21.10.2019, on merits and in accordance with law, and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, and communicate the decision taken to the petitioner.

¶17

This writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No

¶18

costs.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶21

//True Copy//

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

mkn

¶24

¶25

1.The District Collector, Thiruvallur District.

¶26

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, District Revenue Office, Ponneri Taluk.

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

Page numbers

¶29

3.The Tahsildar, Ponneri Taluk.

¶30

+1cc to Mr.B.Divakaran, Advocate SR.40241

¶31

+1cc to the Government Pleader SR.40081

¶32

W.P.No.17780 of 2020

¶33

SR(CO) CB(18/01/2021)

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

Page numbers

R.Krishnamoorthy v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Krishnamoorthy v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bachpan Bachao Andolan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Mrs.Roselin Mary Vs The Chairperson

V.Periasamy Vs The Executive Engineer

Ganamoorthy Vs The District Collector

R.Nagarajan Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

M.Muthaiya Desigar Vs The District Collector