Dismissed

Ganamoorthy v. The District Collector

Madras HC9 Dec 2020WP/17460/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras granted the petitioner liberty to file a statutory appeal under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. The writ petition for certiorari and quashing of a notice was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to exhaust alternative remedies.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to file statutory appeal under Section 10 and 10-B of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 before the District Collector within two weeks.

Ganamoorthy Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 09.12.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA

¶6

WP.No.17460/2020 & WMP.No.21649/2020

¶7

Ganamoorthy ..Petitioner

¶8

Versus
1.The District Collector
Salem District, Saslem 636001.
2.The Tahsildar
Mettur Taluk, Mettur
Salem District 636 401.
3.The Revenue Inspector
Mettur Taluk, Mettur 636401. ..Respondents
Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of
certiorari calling for the records on the file of the 2nd
respondent in Notice No.4403/2020 under section 6 of the Tamil
Nadu Land Encroachment Act 1905 dated on 29.10.2020 and quash
the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Packiaraj
For RR 1 to 3 : Mr.M.Elumalai
Additional Government Pleader

¶9

ORDER

¶10

[Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.]

¶11

(1)After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to avail the alternative remedy under Section 10 read with 10-B of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 before the 1st respondent and also undertakes to send an endorsement through E-Mail to the Registry of this Court.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

(2)The Court the submissions of Mr.M.Elumalai, learned Additional Government Pleader accepting notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 also.

¶14

(3)In the light of the same, the petitioner is granted liberty to file a statutory appeal before the 1st respondent by enclosing necessary and authenticated documents within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order / uploading of the order copy in the website and upon receipt of the same, the 1st respondent or the delegated Appellate Authority shall take up the petition for stay at the first instance and give a disposal to the same in accordance with law within a further period of two weeks thereafter and it is also open to the Appellate Authority to dispose of the main appeal itself as expeditiously as possible.

¶15

(4)The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn subject to
the above observation. No costs. Consequently, the connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
AP
To
1.The District Collector
Salem District, Saslem 636001.
2.The Tahsildar
Mettur Taluk, Mettur
Salem District 636 401.
3.The Revenue Inspector
Mettur Taluk, Mettur 636401.
+1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.No.40104.
WP.No.17460/2020
PVS(CO)
NS(28/12/2020)
KKV/22/02/2021

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ganamoorthy v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganamoorthy v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bachpan Bachao Andolan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Mrs.Roselin Mary Vs The Chairperson

V.Periasamy Vs The Executive Engineer

R.Krishnamoorthy Vs The District Collector

R.Nagarajan Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

M.Muthaiya Desigar Vs The District Collector