2. That the case of the petitioner, as has been projected by Mr. N.G.R.Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, would be that, the second respondent is the Employees' Union, where the petitioner is also a member, who are all the employees of the third respondent. The said second respondent Union is a Registered Trade Union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, where, there has been Bye-laws approved accordingly, which envisages that, the office bearers once selected by conducting election, will be in office for one year and thereafter for electing the next set of office bearers, elections should be held in every year. This has been specifically stated in Clause 11 of the Byelaws of the second respondent Employees' Union and accordingly, the present set of office bearers, who had been elected for the year 2019-2020 had been in the office for more than a year and once the one year period is over, the election has to be conducted, for which, notification is to be issued, however for the reason known to them, the second respondent so far has not come forward to issue election notification to elect new set of office bearers to administer the Union for the next one year i.e., 2020-2021.
