Traffic Dr.K.R.Ramaswamy v. State rep. by The Chief
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.01.2020
C O R A M
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.14170 of 2017
Traffic Dr.K.R.Ramaswamy ... Petitioner
Vs.
State represented by
1.The Chief Secretary,
Government of Tamil nadu,
Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department,
Tamil Nadu,
Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.
3.The Commissioner,
Corporation of chennai,
Ripbon Buildings, Chennai – 600 003.
4.The Commissioner of Police,
Greater Chennai City,
E.V.K.Sampath Salai, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007.
5.The Chairman,
Digital Banner Committee,
Thirumangalam, Chennai – 600 040. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation sent in Public Interest Litigation dated 02.06.2017 and 04.06.2017 to the letter and spirit and take action against the Inspector of Police, E3 Teynampet Police Station , E4, Abhiramapuram Police Station, D1, Triplicane Police Station, J3, Guindy Police Station.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr.G.K.Muthukumar, Special Government Pleader
ORDER
The matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”
today. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner.
Even on the last occasion i.e., on 16.12.2019, the petitioner,
as party in person was personally present before this Court and
submitted that he was unwell and undergoing treatment and
requested for a short adjournment. Recording his submissions,
this Court directed the Registry to list the matter under the
caption “for dismissal” today. It can now be inferred that the
petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition.
Accordingly, these writ petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
// True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nl
To
1.The Chief Secretary,
Government of Tamil nadu,
Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department,
Tamil Nadu,
Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.
3.The Commissioner,
Corporation of chennai,
Ripbon Buildings, Chennai – 600 003.
4.The Commissioner of Police,
Greater Chennai City,
E.V.K.Sampath Salai,
Vepery, Chennai – 600 007.
Copy to: The Inspector of Police, E3, Teynampet Police Station,
E4, Abhiramapuram Police Station, D1, Triplicane Police Station, J3, Guindy Police Station
+1CC to SPL GP. SR.Nos.2726 & 2733.
W.P.No.14170 of 2017
PM(CO) CSR: 07.02.2020
Traffic Dr. K.R. Ramaswamy
State represented by The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil nadu
The Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Tamil Nadu
The Commissioner, Corporation of chennai
The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai City
The Chairman, Digital Banner Committee
Abdul Qudhoose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court