Partly allowed

S.R.Palanisamy v. The District Collector

Madras HC24 Sept 2020WP/13463/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking mandamus against land revenue officials. Directing the Tahsildar to conduct an enquiry and pass final orders regarding a property survey within six weeks pending a fixed date for enquiry.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 2nd respondent to enquire and pass final orders on the land representation within six weeks.

S.R.Palanisamy Vs The District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 24.09.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

W.P.No.13463 of 2020

S.R. Palanisamy

... Petitioner

Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Collectorate,
Salem District.
2. The Tahsildar,
Taluk Office,
Attur Taluk,
Salem District.
3. The Head Surveyor,
Taluk Office,
Attur Taluk,
Salem District .. Respondents

¶9

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2^nd and 3^rd respondents herein to consider the petitioner representation dated 14.2.2020 and reminder representation dated 09.09.2020 to measure the boundaries bearing 56/2A totally admeasuring 3 acres of agricultural land which is situated in Periyari Village, Attur Taluk, Salem District belongs to the petitioner and issue separate patta in favour of the petitioner

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr. A.Rajakumar

¶11

For Respondents: Mr.E.Balamurugan Spl. Govt. Pleader O R D E R

¶12

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2^nd respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 14.2.2020, wherein, the petitioner has sought for the survey of the property and for issuance of patta.

¶13

Mr. E. Balamurugane, learned Special Govt. Pleader

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

appearing for the respondents submitted that the 2^nd respondent has already fixed the date of enquiry on 5.10.2020 at 3 p.m. The learned counsel submitted that the petitioner can be present before the 2^nd respondent with all the relevant documents.

¶16

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also fo the fact that the 2^nd respondent has already fixed a date for enquiry, there shall be a direction to the 2^nd respondent to enquire and pass final orders strictly in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶17

This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

¶18

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
msr
To
1. The District Collector,
Collectorate,
Salem District.
2. The Tahsildar,
Taluk Office,
Attur Taluk,
Salem District.
3. The Head Surveyor,
Taluk Office,
Attur Taluk,
Salem District
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.31517
W.P.No.13463 of 2020

¶19

GJ(CO) GN(19/11/2020)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.R.Palanisamy v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.R.Palanisamy v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Sudhakar Vs The Commissioner

M.Radhakrishnan Vs The sub Registrar Neelankarai

S.Varatharajan Vs The District Registrar

S.Anil Kumar Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

M/S. Vgp Marine Kingdom Private Ltd. Vs Tamil Nadu Generation and

V.Dhanasekar Vs The Collector