This single-line order dismisses the writ petition for non-justiciarystuff as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel stated the matter had become infructuous via endorsement in the court bundle.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.01.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.11651 of 2016
Margaret Caroline Mary ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Chief Regional Manager,
Indian Overseas Bank,
Regional Office, Salem.
2.The Branch Manager,
Indian Overseas Bank,
Puthiragoundan Palayam Branch,
Atthur Taluk, Salem District. ...Respondents
Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to returned the documents, received by the 2nd respondent towards collateral security based on the petitioner's representation dated 25.01.2016 within the time framed by the Hon'ble Court.
For Petitioner : Ms.D.Shobana for Mr.K.Gandhi Kumar ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has now become infructuous. She has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-VI) // True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sms
To
W.P.No.11651 of 2016
PVS(CO)
CSR: 07.02.2020
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Margaret Caroline Mary
The Chief Regional Manager, Indian Overseas Bank
The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
