This order allows four writ miscellaneous petitions seeking condonation of a 2140-day delay. The delay is condoned based on the liberty previously granted by the Division Bench to file review petitions within 30 days.
Condonation of 2140 days delay in filing review petitions and permission for Registry to number review petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.M.P.Nos.5498, 5504, 5510 & 5512 of 2019
W.M.P.Nos.5498, 5504, 5510 & 5512 of 2019
in Rev.Aplw.Nos.SR103146, SR102751, SR103156 & SR103171 of 2018 in W.P.Nos.15798, 27369, 15799 & 15800 of 2010
K.RAVICHANDRABAABU.J.,
These writ miscellaneous petitions are filed seeking to condone the
delay of 2140 days in filing the review petitions.
Challenging the said order, W.A.Nos.1709 to 1712 of 2014 were filed. The Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court disposed of those writ appeals on 01.08.2018, by granting liberty to the appellants therein to approach the writ Court by way of filing review petitions. It is stated that after 30 days from the date of the said order, these review petitions are filed.
of the liberty granted by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court as
discussed supra and further considering the fact that the review petitions
are filed on 25.09.2018, these Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed.
11.02.2020
mk Note: The Registry is directed to number the
Page No. 1/2
W.M.P.Nos.5498, 5504, 5510 & 5512 of 2019
review petitions, if the same is otherwise, in order.
K.RAVICHANDRABAABU.J.,
mk
W.M.P.Nos.5498, 5504, 5510 & 5512 of 2019
in
Rev.Aplw.Nos.SR103146, SR102751,
SR103156 & SR103171 of 2018
in
W.P.Nos.15798, 27369, 15799 & 15800 of 2010
11.02.2020
Page No. 2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay in filing review petitions is permissible when liberty was granted by the Division Bench.
K.Ravichandrababu J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
