The single-judge High Court dismissed a writ miscellaneous petition seeking extension of time to file an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The petition was dismissed for lack of presence of counsel and absence of material details, noting a similar direction had already been given two years prior.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.M.P.No.35021 of 2019
W.M.P.No.35021 of 2019 in
W.P.No.2714 of 2017
K.RAVICHANDRABAABU.J.,
This writ miscellaneous petition is filed on 03.12.2019 seeking for
extension of time granted by this Court for filing an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, while disposing the writ
petition filed in W.P.No.2714 of 2017 dated 02.06.2017.
and the said petition was disposed of on 11.08.2017 by directing the Appellate Tribunal to exclude the period from 02.06.2017 to 14.06.2017, while computing the limitation for accepting the petitioner's appeal petition.
period of nearly 2 years from the date of the earlier order passed on 11.08.2017. It is seen that the affidavit filed in support of the writ
Page No. 1/2
W.M.P.No.35021 of 2019
miscellaneous petition is vague and bereft of material details. Moreover,
K.RAVICHANDRABAABU.J.,
mk
the learned counsel for the petitioner is also not present before this Court.
Hence, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the writ
miscellaneous petition.
4. Accordingly, this Writ Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.
11.02.2020
mk
W.M.P.No.35021 of 2019
in
W.P.No.2714 of 2017
Page No. 2/2
Petitioner (unnamed)
K Ravichandrababu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
