The Court held that the delay in filing the writ petition is condoned on the satisfaction with the reasons stated in the affidavit. This is a procedural order condoning delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.M.P.No.2937 of 2020
W.M.P.No.2937 of 2020 in
W.P.No.SR36030 of 2019
K.RAVICHANDRABAABU.J.,
This writ miscellaneous petition is filed to
condone the delay of 117 days in representing
the writ petition filed in W.P.No.SR36030 of 2019.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner.
3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated
in the affidavit filed in support of this petition,
the delay of 117 days in representing the writ
petition is condoned.
4. Accordingly, this Writ Miscellaneous
Petition is ordered.
04.02.2020
mk
Page No. 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 117 days in filing the writ petition should be condoned.
Whether the reasons provided in the affidavit for condoning the delay are sufficient.
LITIGANT IN W.P.No.SR36030 OF 2019
K. RAVICHANDRABAABU J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
