R.S.Kandhaswamy v. S.Prabakaran
Case brief
What is this about?
WMP.No.16403 of 2020 in W.P. No.4897 of 2017
What the court decided
WMP.No.16403 of 2020
WMP.No.16403 of 2020 in W.P. No.4897 of 2017
M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J., and R. HEMALATHA, J.,
[Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.,]
Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner
and Mr. R. Ezhilarasan, learned counsel appearing for the first
respondent/writ petitioner and Mr.S. Kamalesh Kannan, learned
Government Advocate appearing for the other official respondents.
- In the light of the fact that the channel in question originally ran
across the petitioners' land and according to the 1st respondent/Writ Petitioner, the same has been closed unauthorisedly, this Court is of the considered view that the presence of the petitioners is necessary for effective adjudication of the issue involved in this Writ Petition. Therefore, this petition is ordered. The petitioners are arrayed as
Respondents 8 and 9.
Coram
M. SATHYANARAYANAN
R. HEMALATHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court