Disposed

M.Natarajan v. The District Collector

Madras HC13 Oct 2020WP/14573/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a writ petition challenging the filling up of a water course and impending pucca road construction on Odai Poramboke land. The Court stopped by notice and directed the Block Development Officer to act on a communication dated 06.07.2020, inspect the site, put persons on notice, and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 4th respondent to act on the communication dated 06.07.2020, cause inspection, put concerned persons on notice, and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

M.Natarajan Vs The District Collector — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 13.10.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA

¶6

WP.No.14573/2020 & WMP.No.18065/2020

¶7

M.Natarajan ..Petitioner
Versus
1. The District Collector
District Collector Office
Salem.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer
District Collector Office
Salem.
3. The Tahsildar
Tahsildar Office
Salem South Taluk, Salem.
4. Block Development Officer
Block Development Office,
Veerapandi Union, Salem South Taluk,
Salem
5. Panchayat President
Kalparapatty Village
Veerapandi Union,
Salem South Taluk, Salem. ..Respondents

¶8

Prayer:Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachments made by respondents 4 and 5 on the Odai Poramboke/water course land, situated at S.Nos.36, 37, 70 and 71 to a total extent of one acre of Kalparapatty Village, Veerapandi Union, Salem South Taluk, Salem and also direct them not to lay Tar roads or to make any constructions like Community Hall, Public Toilets therein and to restore the subject water course land to their original shape, size, capacity etc., based on the petitioner's representation dated 25.06.2020.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.S.S.Karthikeyan for M/s.Jury Brain Law Offices

¶11

For Respondents: Mr.P.S.Shanmugasundaram Spl.Government Pleader

¶12

ORDER

¶13

(1)By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal and is disposed of by this order.

¶14

(2)Mr.P.S.Sivashanmugasundaram, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of respondents.

¶15

(3)The petitioner claims to be a resident of Pudupalayam, Kalparapatty Village, Veerapandi Union, Salem South Taluk, Salem and according to him, he owns adjacent lands near the water way / water course in Kalparapatty Village in S.Nos.36, 37, 70 and 71 and it is reflected in the FMB. The grievance expressed by the petitioner is that the 5^th respondent is filling up the water way with earth and thereafter, making attempts to lay a pucca road and the representation dated 25.06.2020 submitted in this regard, did not evoke proper response and hence, the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court by filing this writ petition.

¶16

(4)The learned counsel for the petitioner has invited the attention of this Court to the Memo of the Assistant Director of Rural Development [Project], Salem dated 06.07.2020 in Na.Ka.No.2351/2020/A2, addressed to the 4^th respondent and would submit that by the said Memo, the representation dated 01.07.2020 was forwarded to the 4^th respondent for appropriate action and despite a lapse of nearly two months and odd, no action is being taken and the 5^th respondent is hurriedly proceeding further to lay a pucca road upon the water way and in that event, the petitioner and other agriculturists who own lands adjacent to the said water way, may not be able to get water and the water runs through the said water way to the nearby water body and hence, prays for appropriate orders.

¶17

(5)This Court heard the submissions of Mr.P.S.Sivashanmugasundaram, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶18

(6)Though the petitioner has prayed for a larger relief, this Court, in the light of the above facts and circumstances and without going into the merits of the claim projected by the petitioner, either in his representation or in this writ petition, directs the 4^th respondent to act on the communication of the Assistant Director, Rural Development [Project], Salem, dated 06.07.2020 in Na.Ka.No.2351/2020/A2 after causing necessary inspection and also by putting the concerned person/s on notice and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

this order and communicate the decision taken, to the petitioner.

¶21

(7)The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

//True Copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The District Collector
District Collector Office
Salem.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer
District Collector Office
Salem.
3. The Tahsildar
Tahsildar Office
Salem South Taluk, Salem.
4. Block Development Officer
Block Development Office,
Veerapandi Union, Salem South Taluk,
Salem
5. Panchayat President
Kalparapatty Village
Veerapandi Union,
Salem South Taluk, Salem.

¶26

WP.No.14573/2020 PP(CO) RV(04/11/2020)

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Natarajan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Natarajan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Vijaya Prasanna Vs Union of India rep. by its

P.Chinnaraj Vs The District Collector

C.Sampath Vs The District Collector

Selvi Vs The District Collector

K.Lakshmanan Vs The Inspector General of Registration

M.Rayappan Vs The District Collector