Dismissed

M.Venkatesan v. the Commissioner of Municipal Administration

Madras HC14 Oct 2020WA/2681/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Writ Appeal was filed by an Assistant seeking promotion. The counsel for the appellant filed a letter requesting withdrawal of the appeal on 09.10.2020. The Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and closed connected petitions without costs.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

M.Venkatesan Vs the Commissioner of Municipal… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 14.10.2020

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH and

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

Writ Appeal No.2681 of 2019 and CMP.Nos.17237 and 17238 of 2019

¶7

M.Venkatesan, Assistant, Salem City Municipal Corporation, Salem. ..Appellant

¶8

Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, No.75, Santhome High Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028.

¶9

The Commissioner, Salem City Municipal Corporation, Salem. ..Respondents

¶10

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 23.11.2017 made in WP.No.26393 of 2017 passed by the Single Judge of this Court.

¶11

Petition filed order Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus Calling for the entire records leading to the issue of proceedings bearing Na.Ka.No.C2/17905/2012 dated 29.11.2012 on the file of the 2^nd respondent and quash the same and direct the respondent 5 to include the name of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Superintendent in the panel year 2017-2018 and promote him accordingly.

¶12

For appellant : Mr.T.Ranganathan For respondents : Mrs.A.Srijayanthi, Spl.G.P., for R1 Mr.S.Sathish, for R2 JUDGMENT

¶13

(The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.Subbiah, J)

¶14

This appeal is heard through video-conferencing today. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant by submitting a letter dated 09.10.2020 requested to withdraw this appeal.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

In view of the above letter and submission of the learned counsel for the appellant, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶17

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration,
No.75, Santhome High Road,
Raja Annamalaipuram,
Chennai 600 028.
2.The Commissioner,
Salem City Municipal Corporation,
Salem.
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.34658
Writ Appeal No.2681 of 2019
MP(CO)
RV(19/11/2020)

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Venkatesan v. the Commissioner of Municipal Administration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Venkatesan v. the Commissioner of Municipal Administration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

National Insurance Co.Ltd Vs v.Krishnavni

Vivek Thambuswamy Vs Maria @Sijo Paul

Jaleel Khan Vs G.Anandan

K.I. International Ltd. Vs Lss Ocean Transport Dmcc

The Director of School Education Vs a.Rathinam

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Ramya