7.In our considered opinion, all these reliefs were not reliefs liable to be entertained in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inasmuch as the appellant petitioner virtually wanted an injunction against the Society, which could not be a subject matter for a writ petition and for which, an aggrieved person having the locus could have moved by way of a regular suit or otherwise or approached the concerned authorities in the appropriate forum. The prayer for not accepting elections even before they are approved of was an absolutely premature exercise undertaken by the appellant petitioner in the writ petition and therefore, the writ petition, in our opinion, should not have been entertained at all by the learned Single Judge, much less the passing of any interim order or interfering with the same. Ultimately, the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition and as stated by the learned counsel for respondents 4 and 6, the curtain has already been drawn on the proceedings with the issuance of the G.O. No.633, dated 18.11.2019, which is not the subject matter of challenge in the writ petition. Consequently, there is no merit in this appeal.
