Allowed

Central Provident Fund Commissioner v. a.Abdur Rahim Basha

Madras HC17 Jul 2020CMP/3709/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court condoned a delay of 168 days in filing Writ Appeal SR No.18861 of 2020. Finding sufficient cause, the Court treated the appeal as within time, assigned it a regular number, and tagged it with W.A. No.3501 of 2019.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 168 days condoned; Writ Appeal treated as within time; regular number given; tagged along with W.A. No. 3501 of 2019.

Central Provident Fund Commissioner Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

C.M.P.No.3709 of 2020 in W.A.No. SR 18861 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 17.07.2020

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.A.P.SAHI, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶8

C.M.P.No.3709 of 2020 in W.A.No. SR 18861 of 2020

¶9

1 CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

¶10

GOVT. OF INDIA

¶11

BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN

¶12

14 BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE NEW DELHI-110 066

¶13

2 ADDL.CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER HQ (PENSION)

¶14

EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN 14 BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE NEW DELHI 110 066

¶15

3 REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER – 1 (PENSION) EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANSIATION BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN

¶16

14 BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE, NEW DELHI 110 066.

¶17

4 ADDITIONAL CENTRAL PROVIDENTFUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION

¶18

37 ROYAPETTAH HIGH ROAD

¶19

CHENNAI 14

¶20

Page 1 of 5

¶21

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶22

C.M.P.No.3709 of 2020 in W.A.No. SR 18861 of 2020

¶23

5 REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION 37 ROYAPETTAH HIGH ROAD CHENNAI 14.

¶24

... Petitioner

¶25

¶26

1 A.ABDUR RAHIM BASHA 2 G.ANNAMALAI 3 K.INBANATHAN 4 G.SANKARAN 5 UNION OF INDIA REP BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN RAFI MARG NEW DELHI 110 001

¶27

6 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA (F CI) REP BY CHAIRMAN AND MD 16-20 BARAKHAMBA LANE NEW DELHI 110 001

¶28

7 THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (SOUTH) FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA NO.3 HADDOWS ROAD CHENNAI 6

¶29

8 FCI PROVIDENT FUND TRUST REP BY ITS SECRETARY FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA (FCI) 16-20 BARAKHAMBA LANE NEW DELHI 110 001 ... Respondents

¶30

___________ Page 2 of 5_

¶31

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶32

C.M.P.No.3709 of 2020 in W.A.No. SR 18861 of 2020

¶33

Prayer: Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 168 days in preferring the appeal in W.A. SR No.18861 of 2020.

¶34

For Petitioners : Mr.Kunjithapatam Ramu
For Respondents Mrs.Vedavallikumar
for respondent No.5
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)
We have heard Mr.Kunjithapatam Ramu, learned counsel for the
petitioners and Mrs.Vedavallikumar, learned counsel for respondent
No.5

¶35

We find sufficient cause having been shown in support of the petition for condonation of delay of 168 days in filing the appeal. The delay is, accordingly, condoned.

¶36

___________ Page 3 of 5_

¶37

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶38

C.M.P.No.3709 of 2020 in W.A.No. SR 18861 of 2020

¶39

The Writ Appeal shall be treated to be within time and shall be

¶40

given the regular number and tagged along with W.A.No.3501 of 2019.

¶41

(A.P.S., CJ.) (S.K.R., J.)
17.07.2020
bbr

¶42

Page 4 of 5

¶43

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶44

C.M.P.No.3709 of 2020 in W.A.No. SR 18861 of 2020

¶45

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

¶46

bbr

¶47

C.M.P.No.3709 of 2020
in W.A.No. SR 18861 of 2020
17.07.2020

¶48

___________ Page 5 of 5_

¶49

http://www.judis.nic.in

Central Provident Fund Commissioner v. a.Abdur Rahim Basha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Central Provident Fund Commissioner v. a.Abdur Rahim Basha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Central Provident Fund Commissioner Vs R.Thyagarajan

The Executive Engineer Vs K.Rajendran

Central Provident Fund Commissioner Vs S. Pitchiah

T.Sivaraj Vs the District Registrar

Regional Pf Commissioner -I (Pension) Vs S.Hari

Regional Pf Commissioner I(Pension) Vs S.Vasudevan