Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

K.Guna Vs Dhilip Seshan — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2020)

Home
Madras HC
2020
K.Guna Vs Dhilip SeshanK.Guna v. Dhilip Seshan

Allowed

K.Guna v. Dhilip Seshan

Madras HC9 Nov 2020TR CMP/491/2020

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.11.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA

Tr.C.M.P.No.491 of 2020

K.Guna W/o Dhilip Seshan

..Petitioner/Petitioner

-vs-

Dhilip Seshan S/o Prabhahar

..Respondent/Respondent

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the M.O.P.No.244 of 2019 pending on the file of Family Court, Pondicherry and transfer the same to the Sub Court at Chidambaram for joint trial along with H.M.O.P.No.52 of 2019.

For Petitioner :: Mr.J.Ravikumar For Respondent :: Mrs.Nivedita Ganesan

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Civil Procedure Code24

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
K.Guna
respondent
Dhilip Seshan

Coram

AI extract

T.RAJA

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 9 Nov 2020 · November
Registered: 4 Nov 2020
Case no.: TR CMP/491/2020

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from T.raja

R.Jayachandran Vs C.Rajakumar and 2 others
6 Nov 2020
Mohana Vs K.Rajkumar
6 Nov 2020
M.Hamritha Vs M.a.Kirubakaran
6 Nov 2020
Vijayalaksmi Vs Solaimuthu
9 Nov 2020
Ramasamy Gounder Vs Tamilselvi

Cite this judgement

K.Guna v. Dhilip Seshan, TR CMP/491/2020 (MAD), decided on 9 November 2020.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Civil Procedure Code24

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

T.RAJA

Parties & counsel

Allowed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

The petitioner, Mrs.K.Guna, Wife of Mr.Dhilip Seshan, the respondent herein has once again come to this Court renewing her prayer for withdrawal of the M.O.P.No.244 of 2019 from the file of the Family Court, Pondicherry and transfer the same to the file of the Sub Court at Chidambaram, which was filed by the respondent/ husband seeking dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act on the ground of cruelty, since this Court in the earlier Tr.C.M.P.No.455 of 2019 vide order dated 18.10.2019, dismissed the said writ petition as withdrawn on the ground that the H.M.O.P.No.52 of 2019 filed by the petitioner/wife was allowed ex parte and there was no need for transferring the matter.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that since the H.M.O.P.No.52 of 2019 has been now restored to the file of the Sub Court, Chidambaram at the instance of the

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

respondent/husband, the petitioner has been advised to come to this Court.

4. It is at this stage, Mrs.Nivedita Ganesan, learned counsel taking notice on behalf of the respondent/husband, on instructions, fairly stated that her client has no objection for allowing the prayer of the petitioner for withdrawal of the M.O.P.No.244 of 2019 from the file of the Family Court, Pondicherry and transferring the same to the file of the Sub Court, Chidambaram for a joint trial along with H.M.O.P.No.52 of 2019.

5. Recording the consent given by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent on instructions, the transfer civil miscellaneous petition stands allowed and the M.O.P.No.244 of 2019 is withdrawn from the file of the Family Court, Pondicherry and transferred to the file of the Sub Court, Chidambaram to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No.52 of 2019 filed by the petitioner/wife seeking restitution of conjugal rights. On receipt of the transferred case bundle, the learned Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram is directed to try both the matters together and dispose of the same on their own merit and in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, C.M.P.No.12317 of 2020 is closed.

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ss
To
1. The Judge, Family Court Judge
Pondicherry
2. The Subordinate Judge
Chidambaram
3.The Section Officer,
VR Section, High Court, Madras-104.
+1 cc to M/s.J.Ravikumar, Advocate Sr.No. 36471

Tr.C.M.P.No.491 of 2020 KK(CO) RMP(08/12/2020)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

CNR

HCMA010491922020

Topic

Service and Employment

Bench

Disposal

ALLOWED

9 Nov 2020

K.R.Palanisamy Vs Varadarajan

9 Nov 2020