R.Jayachandran v. C.Rajakumar and 2 others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners filed contempt petitions for non-compliance with a 2019 order. Records indicated the order was complied with; both petitions were closed administratively.
What did the court decide?
Both contempt petitions were closed; no punishment was awarded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition Nos.886 & 887 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.11.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
Contempt Petition Nos.886 & 887 of 2020
R.Jayachandran .. Petitioner in Cont.P.No.886 of 2020
J.Bharath Kumar .. Petitioner in Cont.P.No.887 of 2020
-vs-
1. Mr.C.Rajakumar
Revenue Divisional Officer
Tambaram
Chennai 600 045
Kancheepuram District
2. Mr.Chandrasekar
Tahsildar, Alandur Taluk
Nanganallur
Chennai 600 061
3. Mr.Chandrasekar
Special Tahsildar
(Town Survey & Settlement)
Alandur, Corporation Building
Kancheepuram District
Chennai 600 016 .. Respondents in both the Cont.Petns.
Petitions under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 20.11.2019 made in W.P.Nos.13302 & 13303 of 2015.
1/3
Contempt Petition Nos.886 & 887 of 2020
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Jayachandran
- petitioner
J. Bharath Kumar
- respondent
Mr. C. Rajakumar
- respondent
Mr. Chandrasekar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court