Allowed

Ajantha Mary v. D.Ravikumar

Madras HC8 Jan 2020TR CMP/341/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a transfer petition to move proceedings from the I Additional Family Court at Chennai to the Family Court at Kanyakumari. The transfer was granted based on the petitioner's difficulty in traveling, highlighting prompt trial completion.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings withdrawn from I Additional Family Court, Chennai and transferred to Family Court, Kanyakumari @ Nagercoil; connected C.M.P. closed; prompt trial direction issued.

Ajantha Mary Vs D.Ravikumar — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 08.01.2020

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶5

Transfer C.M.P.No.341 of 2018

¶6

Ajantha Mary ...Petitioner

¶7

vs.

¶8

D.Ravikumar ...Respondent

¶9

Tr.C.M.P. filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., to withdraw I.D.O.P.No.1453 of 2017 from the file of the I Additional Family Court at Chennai and transfer the same to the file of the Family Court at Kanyakumari @ Nagercoil.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Kamarasu

¶11

For Respondent : No appearance

¶12

Petitioner has come up with this Petition seeking transfer of I.D.O.P.No.1453 of 2017 from the file of the I Additional Family Court at Chennai to the file of the Family Court at Kanyakumari @ Nagercoil.

¶13

According to the Petitioner, it would be difficult for her to travel all the way from Ambilikonam, Kanyakumari District to attend the hearings in I.D.O.P.No.1453 of 2017 on the file of the Family Court at Chennai, along with her children.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. None appears on behalf of the Respondent in spite of his name printed in the cause list, after service.

¶15

There is nothing on record to suspect the bonafides in filing this Transfer Petition. I am therefore of the view that the Transfer Petition deserves to be allowed.

¶16

In the result, the proceedings in I.D.O.P.No.1453 of 2017 is withdrawn from the file of the I Additional Family Court at Chennai and is transferred to the Family Court at Kanyakumari @ Nagercoil, for trial. The Family Court at

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Kanyakumari @ Nagercoil, is expected to conclude the trial, as expeditiously as possible, without adjourning the matter beyond 45 working days at any point of time, to bring the issue to a logical end.

¶19

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed as indicated above. No costs. Consequently, connected C.M.P.No.8744 of 2018 is closed.

¶20

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶21

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To :
1. The I Additional Family Court
at Chennai.
2. The Family Court
at Kanyakumari @ Nagercoil.
+1cc to M/s.P.Kamarasu, Advocate Sr.2312
Tr.C.M.P.No.341 of 2018
bp[co]
srg 21/02/2020

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ajantha Mary v. D.Ravikumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajantha Mary v. D.Ravikumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Malliga Vs Kalpana

M.G.Usha Vs C.Muthuselan

Kanchana Vs a.Senthil Maharaj

Perumal Gounder Vs the Competent Authority

S.Sujithra Vs K.Sasidaran

Happy Home Promoters India Pvt. Vs Vikram a Jain