The High Court dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeal as abated since the appellant had died and the appeal letter was returned undelivered.
The civil miscellaneous appeal was dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.01.2020 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN C.M.A. No.909 of 2011
Perumal Gounder
...Petitioner
vs.
1.The Competent Authority & Special District Revenue Officer, (L.A.) National Highways - 45 Expansion Scheme Ponnagar, Tiruchirappalli - 620 001
2.The Project Director National Highways - 45 Expansion Scheme Ponnagar, Tiruchirappalli - 620 001 3.The Special Tahsildar, (Land Acquisition) National Highways - 45 Expansion Scheme Perambalur ...Respondents
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the order of the learned Principal District Judge, Perambalur made in A.O.P. No.1 of 2009 dated 7.1.2011.
For Appellant : Mr.I.Abrar Md. Abdullah For Respondents : Mr.Sricharan, Spl. GP for R1 & R3 M/s.P.Wilson Associates for R2 J U D G M E N T
It is represented by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant is no more. He has sent a letter, and the same has been returned. In view of the said submission, the appeal is abated.
Page No.1 of 2
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(J)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Asr
To
The Principal District Judge, Perambalur
+1cc to Special Government pleader(CS) sr2300
C.M.A. No.909 of 2011
aa05/02/2020
Page No.2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Perumal Gounder
The Competent Authority & Special District Revenue Officer
The Project Director National Highways - 45 Expansion Scheme
The Special Tahsildar
S.Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
