S. Deepa v. J. Karthikeyan
Case brief
What is this about?
Transfer application to move a Hindu Marriage Oppression Petition from Puducherry Family Court to Mettur Subordinate Court allowed. Dated order grants video conferencing facility due to lockdown.
What did the court decide?
HMOP transferred to Subordinate Judge, Mettur; video conferencing facility mandated for both parties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.11.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
Tr. C.M.P. No.28 of 2018 and C.M.P. No.738 of 2018
S.Deepa ... Petitioner -vsJ.Karthikeyan ... Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C to withdraw HMOP.No.64 of 2017 on the file of the learned Family Court Judge at Puducherry and to transfer the same to the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Mettur.
For Petitioner : Ms.Saraswathi Muthiah
For Respondent : Mr.R.Dillikumar
The Transfer C.M.P. has been filed seeking to withdraw HMOP.No.64 of 2017 on the file of the learned Family Court Judge at Puducherry and to transfer the same to the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Mettur.
2.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-wife would submit that the respondent husband has filed HMOP.No.64/2017 second time reviving his desire for dissolution of the marriage solemnized on 26.08.2009 as per the Hindu rites and customs at Palayalayam Sakthi Mahal, Erode. On an earlier occasion, the petitioner wife has given a complaint before the All Women Police Station Mettur which was taken cognizance by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Mettur Dam in CC.No.199/11 for the offences under Sections 498-A and 506(ii) of IPC. When the said case was pending, the respondent husband has filed HMOP.No.100/2011 before the Sub-Court, Mettur, on the ground of cruelty that was subsequently withdrawn on the basis of the compromise reached between the parties by order dated 12.07.2011. Subsequently, by judgment dated 23.11.2011, the respondent husband was also acquitted by the Criminal Court in
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether consent by both parties to transfer a pending Hindu Marriage Oppression Petition from one Family Court to another Subordinate Court and to conduct proceedings via video conferencing should be
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Deepa
- respondent
J. Karthikeyan
Coram
T. RAJA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court