is vested with enormous power to give special directions with regard to the mode in which the account is to be taken. Therefore, when Order XX, Rule 17 of the Code vested the Court to give special directions with regard to the mode in which the account is to be taken with a further direction that in taking the account, the books of accounts shall be taken as prima facie evidence of the truth of the matters therein contained with liberty to the parties to take such objection thereto, no prejudice can be found. Therefore, the arguments advanced by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant that the impugned decretal order appointing an Advocate Receiver has to go, cannot be accepted. The reason being that when the Court below is vested with the special power under Order XX, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure to give special direction directing the accounts to be taken or by any subsequent order can give special direction with regard to the mode in which the account is to be taken, as the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.130 of 2008 dated 1.10.2010 have become final and concluded, hence, they are capable of being executed, therefore, answering the substantial questions of law against the appellant, both the civil miscellaneous appeals fail and they are dismissed. Consequently, C.M.P.Nos.24177 & 24185 of 2019 are also dismissed. No costs.
