Lazar v. Arokkia Mary
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge dismissed the petition for transfer of an ongoing suit. However, directing the lower court to conclude the trial within six months without adjourning beyond 15 days, considering the petitioner is a senior citizen.
What did the court decide?
Directed the District Munsif, Chengalpattu, to conclude the trial within six months without adjourning beyond 15 working days.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.01.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
TRANSFER C.M.P.NO.227 OF 2019
1.Lazar 2.Samikannu (Died)
...Petitioners
vs.
1.Arokkia Mary
2.Augustine
3.Thomas
4.Anthony
5.Irudhayamary
6.Mary
7.Vellankanni
8.Lurudumary
9.Arulappathomas ...Respondents
Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., to withdraw and transfer O.S. No.232/2005 from the file of District Munsif Court, Chengalpattu to District Munsif Court, Alandur or City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Udayakumar For Respondent : No appearance
This petition has been filed, to withdraw and transfer O.S. No.232/2005 pending on the file of District Munsif Court, Chengalpattu to District Munsif Court, Alandur or City Civil Court, Chennai.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to withdraw and transfer the suit to a different court due to alleged boycotts.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lazar
- petitioner
Samikannu
- respondent
Arokkia Mary
- respondent
Augustine
- respondent
Thomas
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court