Allowed

M.Kumar v. Priyanka

Madras HC11 Mar 2020TR CMP/126/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge allowed the petitioner's transfer petition under Section 24 CPC. The court withdrew the original petition from Tiruvannamalai and transferred it to Chengalpattu, as there was no objection from the respondent. Directives were issued for record transfer and disposal timelines.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of H.M.O.P.No.154 of 2019 from Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruvannamalai to Principal Subordinate Court, Chengalpattu with directions for record dispatch within ten days and disposal within

M.Kumar Vs Priyanka — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 11.03.2020

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

Tr.C.M.P.No.126 of 2020 and C.M.P.No.4293 of 2020

¶6

M.Kumar ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. Priyanka
2. The District Registrar (Admin),
Integrated Registrar's Office,
Veppamaram Street,
Velapadi, Vellore,
Tamil Nadu – 632 001.
3. The Sub Registrar,
Sub Registrar's Office,
Kalasapakkam Taluk,
Tiruvannamalai District – 606 751. ... Respondent

¶7

Petition filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure to withdraw and transfer H.M.O.P.No.154 of 2019 pending on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruvannamalai to file of Principal Subordinate Court, Chengalpattu.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Prabhakaran

¶9

For Respondents: Ms.Shaikh Mehrunisa (R1)

¶10

Mr.Dev Narendran, Government Advocate (R2 & R3)

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The petitioner, who is the husband of the 1^st respondent, has filed the above Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition to withdraw and transfer H.M.O.P.No.154 of 2019 pending on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruvannamalai to the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Chengalpattu.

¶13

2.In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petitioner has stated that the petitioner as well as the 1^st respondent are residing at Maduranthagam Taluk, Kancheepuram District and therefore, it would be convenient for both the

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

¶16

parties to prosecute and contest the Original Petition before the Principal Subordinate Court, Chengalpattu.

¶17

3.Ms.Shaikh Mehrunisa, learned counsel appearing for the 1^st respondent has no objection for withdrawing and transferring the Original Petition in H.M.O.P.No.154 of 2019 pending on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruvannamalai to the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Chengalpattu.

¶18

4.Mr.Dev Narendran, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 2 & 3 also has no objection for transferring the H.M.O.P.No.154 of 2019 to the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Chengalpattu.

¶19

5.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, I withdraw the Original Petition in H.M.O.P.No.154 of 2019 pending on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Tiruvannamalai and transfer the same to the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Chengalpattu. The Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruvannamalai is directed to despatch the records pertaining to H.M.O.P.No.154 of 2019 to the Principal Subordinate Court, Chengalpattu within ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the same, the Principal Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu is directed to re-number the Original Petition and dispose of the same within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of the papers.

¶20

6.With these observations, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶21

va To

¶22

1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Tiruvannamalai. 2.The Principal Subordinate Court, Chengalpattu.

¶23

+1cc to Spl.Government Pleader(C.S) SR.21576

¶24

+1 CC to Ms.Shaikh Mehrunisa, Advocate sr 22559(17/03/2020)

¶25

Tr.C.M.P.No.126 of 2020 and C.M.P.No.4293 of 2020

¶26

AD(CO) CB(12/03/2020)

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

M.Kumar v. Priyanka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Kumar v. Priyanka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Shreelatha Vs M.Raja

V.Sankaranarayanan Vs Indian Bank

M/S.Professional Management Vs Employees State Insurance Corp

Vs

Vidhya Swaminathan Vs D.Swaminathan

V.Shanmugam Vs Bama Balaji