Chitra v. K.R.Subramaniam
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras disposed of a second appeal under Section 100 of CPC which was withdrawn by the counsel for the appellants upon recording of their submission.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 10.01.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
S.A.No.458 of 2000 and C.M.P.No.3822 of 2000
- Chitra
2. Sumathy
3. Suguna : Appellants/Plaintiff
Vs.
1. K.R.Subramaniam
2. Ponnammal
3. Ammaniammal
4. Nagathal
5.M.Govindammal : Respondents/Defendants
Prayer :- This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 28.01.1999 made in A.S.No.8 of 1998 on the file of the Principal District Court, Erode, confirming the judgment and decree dated 17.11.1997 in O.S.No.957 of 1995, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Erode.
For Appellants : Mr.M.Arun
For Respondents
For R1, R4, R5 : Not ready in notice
For R2 : Notice served, No appearance
For R3 : No appearance.
JUDGMENT
This second appeal is directed as against the judgment and decree dated 28.01.1999 made in A.S.No.8 of 1998 on the file of the Principal District Court, Erode, confirming the judgment and decree dated 17.11.1997 in O.S.No.957 of 1995, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Erode.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Chitra
- appellant
Sumathy
- appellant
Suguna
- respondent
K.R. Subramaniam
- respondent
Ponnammal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court