Narayanan v. v.Baskar
Case brief
What is this about?
A second appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC was dismissed as settled out of court. The connected miscellaneous petition was also closed without any costs awarded.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as settled out of court with no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.12.2020 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN SA. No.772 of 2014 and MP No.1 of 2014
S.Narayanan ..Appellant
Vs.
- V.Baskar
- Saratha Ammal
3. N.Ratha Krishnan
4. R.Palani
5. R.Mohanraj ..Respondents
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 13.02.2013 passed in A.S.No.30 of 2011 on the file of Principal District Judge, at Tiruvallur, reversing the judgment and decree dated 31.01.2011 passed in O.S.No.4 of 2006 on the file of Subordinate Judge at Poonamallee.
For Appellant : Mr.Ayyaparaja
for M/s.R.Bharath Kumar
For Respondents: Mr.M.R.Khapali
J U D G M E N T
This matter is taken up for hearing through VideoConferencing.
Mr. Ayyaparaja, learned counsel representing M/s.R.Bharath Kumar appearing for the appellant would submit that the Second Appeal has been settled out of Court.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S.Narayanan
- respondent
V.Baskar
- respondent
Saratha Ammal
- respondent
N.Ratha Krishnan
- respondent
R.Palani
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court